SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies
12 references·10 citing·42 second hopsampled
The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies (2016)The use of rapid review methods in health…Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic (2015)Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid!…Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology (2015)Rapid evidence assessment: in…How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? (2015)How to conduct systematic rev…A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts (2015)A taxonomy of rapid reviews l…RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2014)RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APP…What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments (2012)What is a rapid review? A met…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence (2010)Issues in conducting and diss…Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Expediting systematic reviews…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? (2008)RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC …Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment (2008)Rapid reviews versus full sys…Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence (2024)Rapid review: A review of met…Rapid literature review: definition and methodology (2023)Rapid literature review: defi…Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries (2021)Adaptive health technology as…A rapid review of gender, sex, and sexual orientation documentation in electronic health records (2020)A rapid review of gender, sex…“It has no meaning to me.” How do researchers understand the effectiveness of literature searches? A qualitative analysis and preliminary typology of understandings (2020)“It has no meaning to me.” Ho…The ‘Top 10’ Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint (2019)The ‘Top 10’ Challenges for H…Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Single screening versus conve…Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar (2019)Pragmatic methods for reviewi…Case report: a rapid review approach used by the UK National Screening Committee to inform recommendations on general population screening for vasa praevia (2019)Case report: a rapid review a…A scoping review found increasing examples of rapid qualitative evidence syntheses and no methodological guidance (2019)A scoping review found increa…Methodological approaches of health technology assessment (1999)THE USE AND IMPACT OF RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS (2000)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact (2005)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Priorities and challenges for health leadership and workforce management globally: a rapid review (2019)International estimates of intended uptake and refusal of COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of large nationally representative samples (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review (2017)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review (2016)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews (2018)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Introducing SoNHR–Reporting guidelines for Social Networks In Health Research (2023)Bridging the Gap Between Time Management Research and Task Management App Design: A Study on the Integration of Planning Fallacy Mitigation Strategies (2024)Workforce agility: a systematic literature review and research agenda (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,246 cited
  • 2010Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews756 cited
  • 2008Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment236 cited
  • 2015Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic184 cited
  • 2015Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology177 cited
  • 2008RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?170 cited
  • 2014RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT138 cited
  • 2012What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments137 cited
  • 2015How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?104 cited
  • 2010Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence83 cited
  • 2015A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts76 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review639 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Rapid literature review: definition and methodology
190 cited
  • 2020A rapid review of gender, sex, and sexual orientation documentation in electronic health records73 cited
  • 2019The ‘Top 10’ Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint54 cited
  • 2021Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries50 cited
  • 2019A scoping review found increasing examples of rapid qualitative evidence syntheses and no methodological guidance22 cited
  • 2019Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar16 cited
  • 2020“It has no meaning to me.” How do researchers understand the effectiveness of literature searches? A qualitative analysis and preliminary typology of understandings15 cited
  • 2019Case report: a rapid review approach used by the UK National Screening Committee to inform recommendations on general population screening for vasa praevia12 cited
  • 2024Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence8 cited