Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An appraisal of meta‐analysis guidelines: how do they relate to safety outcomes?

16 references·3 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
2015Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data2,123 cited
2004What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data1,731 cited
2014Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis1,402 cited
2011Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 11,036 cited
2007Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): Classification of Suicidal Events in the FDA’s Pediatric Suicidal Risk Analysis of Antidepressants1,023 cited
2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events

938 cited

2011Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2770 cited

2010Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data755 cited

2013Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4730 cited

Cited by

2023Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses11 cited
2025Enhancing search strategies for systematic reviews on drug Harms: An evaluation of the utility of ChatGPT in error detection and keyword generation9 cited
2019Bivariate beta-binomial model using Gaussian copula for bivariate meta-analysis of two binary outcomes with low incidence9 cited