SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
13 references·1 citing·47 second hop
La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) (2016)La version franco-canadienne de l'outil A…Une version franco-canadienne de la Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale : L'Échelle PEDro (2015)Une version franco-canadienne…Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. (2013)Systematic reviews explained:…Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature (2013)Reporting and Methodological …Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Evaluation of the Endorsement…Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews (2012)Reliability and External Vali…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~! (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in Endodontics (2010)A Systematic Evaluation of th…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Guidelines for the Process of…La traduction d'instruments de mesure pour la recherche gérontologique en langue française: critères métrologiques et inventaire (1994)La traduction d'instruments d…Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française. (1989)Vers une méthodologie de vali…[One method of trans-cultural validation of psychological questionnaires: implications for sports psychology]. (1983)[One method of trans-cultural…La version franco-canadienne du « STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology » (STROBE) Statement : L’outil STROBE (2019)La version franco-canadienne …An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research (1970)The Satisfaction With Life Scale (1985)The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education (1992)An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport (1999)The intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the English version (2002)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Failure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry (2011)Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics (2018)Glossary for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews (2013)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines (1993)Translating Health Status Questionnaires and Evaluating Their Quality (1998)Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for Use in Japan (1998)Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005)Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline (2010)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review (2017)Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies (2017)Neighbourhood community life and health: A systematic review of reviews (2019)French cross-cultural adaptation of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) (2019)Building resilience for healthcare professionals working in an Italian red zone during the COVID‐19 outbreak: A pilot study (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures14,852 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,544 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 1989Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française.1,115 cited
  • 2013Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses918 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!329 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.116 cited
  • 2013Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature115 cited
  • 1983[One method of trans-cultural validation of psychological questionnaires: implications for sports psychology].80 cited
  • 2010A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in Endodontics49 cited
  • 2012Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews35 cited
  • 2015Une version franco-canadienne de la Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale : L'Échelle PEDro

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited
  • 1994La traduction d'instruments de mesure pour la recherche gérontologique en langue française: critères métrologiques et inventaire26 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019La version franco-canadienne du « STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology » (STROBE) Statement : L’outil STROBE5 cited