What if Klein & Barron are right about insect sentience?

Bob Fischer

9 citations0/0 files storedAnimal Sentience

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Animal Law and Welfare Philosophical Ethics and Theory Environmental Philosophy and Ethics

Abstract

If Klein & Barron are right, then insects may well be able to feel pain. If they can, then the standard approach to animal ethics generates some implausible results. Philosophers need to develop alternatives to this framework to avoid them.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

2016Insects have the capacity for subjective experience 2007Invertebrate Minds: A Challenge for Ethical Theory 2013Person-Rearing Relationships as a Key to Higher Moral Status 2020What’s Wrong with Speciesism 1993The animals issue: moral theory in practice

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.