Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies

8 references·6 citing·26 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT47,910 cited
1965Akufo and Ibarapa16,856 cited
1999Measuring agreement in method comparison studies9,616 cited
2007Why Bland–Altman plots should use X , not ( Y + X )/2 when X is a reference method416 cited
2009Confidence in Altman–Bland plots: A critical review of the method of differences369 cited
2008Statistical Models for Assessing Agreement in Method Comparison Studies with Replicate Measurements184 cited
2004Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors: Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies115 cited
2009Comparing methods of measurement: Extending the LoA by regression57 cited

Cited by

2020A new statistical methodology overcame the defects of the Bland–Altman method33 cited
2019Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies30 cited
2018MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies28 cited
2021An Extension of the Bland–Altman Plot for Analyzing the Agreement of More than Two Raters26 cited
2022The Bland-Altman method should not be used when one of the two measurement methods has negligible measurement errors18 cited
2023Bland and Altman agreement method: to plot differences against means or differences against standard? An endless tale?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited