SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews
16 references·10 citing·39 second hop
Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews (2016)Current state of ethics literature synthe…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice (2012)Qualitative Content Analysis …Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques (2011)Doing Your Literature Review:…Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (2010)Qualitative InhaltsanalyseDoing a literature review in health and social care : a practical guide (2010)Doing a literature review in …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic Reviews in the Soc…The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The integrative review: updat…Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken (2003)Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : …Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method (1999)Health Sciences Literature Re…Embedded Ethics in Practice: A Toolbox for Integrating the Analysis of Ethical and Social Issues into Healthcare AI Research (2024)Embedded Ethics in Practice: …RESERVE - REporting of SystEmatic ReViews in Ethics: development, explanations and examples (2023)RESERVE - REporting of SystEm…In defence of the bioethics scoping review: Largely systematic literature reviewing with broad utility (2021)In defence of the bioethics s…What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity? (2020)What constitutes expertise in…Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review (2020)Systematic reviews of empiric…How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper) (2019)How to tackle the conundrum o…Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review (2019)Core aspects of ubuntu: A sys…Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review (2019)Core aspects of ubuntu: A sys…Identifying the Need for Good Practices in Health Technology Assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA (2018)Identifying the Need for Good…What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews (2017)What methods do reviews of no…The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research (2008)Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Qualitative Content Analysis (2014)Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper (2017)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2005The integrative review: updated methodology10,189 cited
  • 2003Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken6,562 cited
  • 2012Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice5,796 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences3,582 cited
  • 2010Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse1,752 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2011Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques639 cited
  • 1999Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

504 cited
  • 2010Doing a literature review in health and social care : a practical guide446 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review168 cited
    • 2018Identifying the Need for Good Practices in Health Technology Assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA123 cited
    • 2019Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review82 cited
    • 2019How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper)74 cited
    • 2023RESERVE - REporting of SystEmatic ReViews in Ethics: development, explanations and examples50 cited
    • 2017What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews42 cited
    • 2021In defence of the bioethics scoping review: Largely systematic literature reviewing with broad utility26 cited
    • 2024Embedded Ethics in Practice: A Toolbox for Integrating the Analysis of Ethical and Social Issues into Healthcare AI Research23 cited
    • 2020What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?17 cited
    • 2020Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review14 cited