SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list
7 references·12 citing·35 second hop
Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list (2016)Presence of alleged predatory journals in…Predatory Journals in Library Databases: How Much Should We Worry? (2015)Predatory Journals in Library…Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Firm action needed on predato…Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers (2015)Beyond Beall’s List: Better u…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access (2013)Predatory publishing is just …Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Pay Big to Publish Fast: Academic Journal Rackets. (2012)Pay Big to Publish Fast: Acad…Can ChatGPT identify predatory biomedical and dental journals? A cross-sectional content analysis (2024)Can ChatGPT identify predator…A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications (2024)A Rapid Investigation of Arti…How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts (2023)How should we handle predator…Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (2023)Challenges posed by hijacked …An analysis of dental articles in predatory journals and associated online engagement (2022)An analysis of dental article…Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers (2021)Journals in Beall's list perf…Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals (2021)Citation patterns between imp…Predatory publishing and predatory journals: a critical review and proposed research agenda for higher education (2020)Predatory publishing and pred…Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view (2020)Evaluation of untrustworthy j…Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies (2019)Hype or Real Threat: The Exte…An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals (2019)An Education Session Develope…Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies (2018)Publishing in predatory touri…Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services (2019)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Never mind predatory publishers… what about ‘grey’ publishers? (2023)‘Special issue-ization’ as a growth and revenue strategy: Reproduction by the “big five” and the risks for research integrity (2024)The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations (2023)Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study (2023)How metric-based performance evaluation systems fuel the growth of questionable publications? (2024)Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)La ruta de oro de la publicación científica: del negocio de las revistas a las revistas negocio (2024)Red alert: Millions of “homeless” publications in Scopus should be resettled (2025)Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English (2010)Linguistic Imperialism Continued (2013)Academic performance, publishing and peer review: peering into the twilight zone (2015)‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing (2017)Scholarly databases under scrutiny (2018)The Ethics of Predatory Journals (2016)Citations of articles in predatory nursing journals (2019)How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2015Firm action needed on predatory journals242 cited
  • 2013Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access167 cited
  • 2015Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers163 cited
  • 2012Pay Big to Publish Fast: Academic Journal Rackets.54 cited
  • 2015Predatory Journals in Library Databases: How Much Should We Worry?41 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus47 cited
  • 2021Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals34 cited
  • 2018Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies32 cited
  • 2020Predatory publishing and predatory journals: a critical review and proposed research agenda for higher education31 cited
  • 2020Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view25 cited
  • 2024Can ChatGPT identify predatory biomedical and dental journals? A cross-sectional content analysis23 cited
  • 2023How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

21 cited
  • 2024A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications19 cited
  • 2019An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals17 cited
  • 2021Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers16 cited
  • 2019Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies12 cited
  • 2022An analysis of dental articles in predatory journals and associated online engagement11 cited