Action versus state orientation moderates the impact of executive functioning on real-life self-control.

Max Wolff · Klaus‐Martin Krönke · John Venz · Anja Kräplin · Gerhard Bühringer · Michael N. Smolka +1 more

80 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Experimental Psychology General

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Behavioral Health and Interventions Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Abstract

Self-control is commonly assumed to depend on executive functions (EFs). However, it is unclear whether real-life self-control failures result from deficient EF competencies or rather reflect insufficient conflict-induced mobilization of executive control, and whether self-control depends more critically on function-specific EF competencies or general executive functioning (GEF), that is, common competencies that underlie all EFs. Here we investigated whether failure-related action versus state orientation, a personality trait related to the conflict-induced mobilization of cognitive control, moderates the effect of general and function-specific control competencies on self-control. To this end, 240 young adults completed questionnaire measures of action-state orientation and trait self-control, reported everyday self-control failures during 7 consecutive days via smartphone-based experience sampling, and completed 9 EF tasks from which latent variables reflecting GEF as well as inhibition-, updating-, and shifting-specific competencies were derived. Structural equation models confirmed that the effect of GEF on self-control was moderated by action-state orientation: action-oriented compared with more state-oriented participants showed a stronger inverse association between GEF and everyday self-control failures. Corresponding effects of function-specific competencies on self-control were not found. These results highlight that high executive functioning may enable self-controlled behavior only if control is sufficiently mobilized when needed and suggest that self-control may depend more critically on general than function-specific control competencies. More generally, the present study demonstrates the fruitfulness of combining latent-variable models of well-controlled EF tasks with experience sampling of daily self-control and measures of individual differences in control modes to bridge the gap between laboratory research and real-life behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 80 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1977Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.2007Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research 2004High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success 1991A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary 2001A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis 2011A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety 2000Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?

Cited by

2018Becoming who you are: An integrative review of self‐determination theory and personality systems interactions theory 2022Why Doesn’t Executive Function Training Improve Academic Achievement? Rethinking Individual Differences, Relevance, and Engagement from a Contextual Framework 2020Chronic stress, executive functioning, and real‐life self‐control: An experience sampling study 2023The Willpower Paradox: Possible and Impossible Conceptions of Self-Control

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.