Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When courts accept what science rejects: Custody issues concerning the alleged “parental alienation syndrome”

2 references·9 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009A Historical Perspective on Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation118 cited
2002Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation: Getting it Wrong in Child Custody Cases72 cited

Cited by

2016Recommended treatments for “parental alienation syndrome” (PAS) may cause children foreseeable and lasting psychological harm45 cited
2019Are intensive parental alienation treatments effective and safe for children and adolescents?34 cited
2020Malicious Reports of Child Maltreatment as Coercive Control: Mothers and Domestic and Family Violence33 cited
2019Parental Alienation Syndrome in Spain: opposed by the Government but accepted in the Courts25 cited
2017Family court ordered “reunification therapy:” junk science in the guise of helping parent/child relationships?22 cited
2020Obey the justice system or protect children? The moral dilemma posed by false parental alienation syndrome20 cited
2020Empirical research on parental alienation: A descriptive literature review18 cited
2019Parental alienation, coaching and the best interests of the child: Allegations of child sexual abuse in the Family Court of Australia18 cited
2019Valid and invalid ways to assess the reason a child rejects a parent: The continued malignant role of “parental alienation syndrome”17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work