Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals

4 references·5 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal125 cited
2010Pubcreds: Fixing the Peer Review Process by “Privatizing” the Reviewer Commons89 cited
2015Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars Decline to Review their Peers’ Work89 cited
2010Battling the Paper Glut47 cited

Cited by

2017Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution28 cited
2022The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal’s perspective24 cited
2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences16 cited
2020The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case study14 cited
2020Peer review analysis in the field of radiation oncology: results from a web-based survey of the Young DEGRO working group11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work