Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

‘Spin’ in reports of clinical research

8 references·3 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
2012Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study293 cited
2016A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity224 cited
2015Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis105 cited
2011The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research103 cited
2009Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study93 cited

Cited by

2022Assessing “Spin” in Urology Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes11 cited
2022“Spin” in Plastic Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials with Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes: A Systematic Review8 cited
2020Flexibilization of Science, Cognitive Biases, and the COVID-19 Pandemic5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work