Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

‘Common But Differentiated Responsibilities’ in the National Courts: Lessons fromUrgendav.The Netherlands

16 references·2 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1981Principles of Public International Law1,123 cited
1973Principles of Public International Law1,063 cited
1977International Law959 cited
2003International Law466 cited
1996A Typology of Transjudicial Communication280 cited
2008Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts243 cited
2011COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL LAW? THE ROLE OF NATIONAL COURTS IN CREATING AND ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL LAW202 cited
2015Climate Change Litigation173 cited
1993Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts158 cited
2009National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law123 cited
2011Climate Change Liability119 cited
2015Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy118 cited
2015Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: WillUrgendaTurn the Tide?54 cited
2009Adjudicating climate change : state, national, and international approaches51 cited
2015The Urgenda Decision: Netherlands Liable for Role in Causing Dangerous Global Climate Change47 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands46 cited

Cited by

2019Climate Change and the Voiceless: Protecting Future Generations, Wildlife, and Natural Resources29 cited
2019Domestic Courts and the Paris Agreement's Climate Goals: The Need for a Comparative Approach16 cited