SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
7 references·6 citing·43 second hop
Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis (2016)Characteristics of Retractions from Korea…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Governing knowledge in the sc…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Governing Knowledge in the Scientific Community: Exploring the Role of Retractions in Biomedicine (2011)Governing Knowledge in the Sc…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)Retractions in the research l…Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionRetracted systematic reviews continued to be frequently cited: a citation analysis (2022)Retracted systematic reviews …Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health (2022)Comprehensive analysis of ret…Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)Recommendations from the Redu…Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties (2021)Losing young researchers in t…More detailed guidance on the inclusion/exclusion of retracted articles in systematic reviews is needed (2019)More detailed guidance on the…How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification (2019)How many retracted articles i…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Human Error (1990)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Toward a new economics of science (1994)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Reverse Matthew Effect: Catastrophe and Consequence in Scientific Teams (2013)Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals (2016)Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations (2022)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1958)The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions (2017)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? (2018)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Addressing disorder in scholarly communication: Strategies from NISO Plus 2021 (2021)The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical (2022)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Characteristics of global retractions of schizophrenia-related publications: A bibliometric analysis (2022)From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection (2022)Retracted publications in BRICS countries: an analytical study (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Patterns of connections and movements in dual‐map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis (2013)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews (2023)Availability of retracted Covid-19 papers on Internet research-sharing platforms (2024)Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field (2024)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 2006Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?161 cited
  • 2012Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine151 cited
  • 2011Governing Knowledge in the Scientific Community: Exploring the Role of Retractions in Biomedicine26 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health22 cited
  • 2021Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project13 cited
  • 2022Retracted systematic reviews continued to be frequently cited: a citation analysis13 cited
  • 2019More detailed guidance on the inclusion/exclusion of retracted articles in systematic reviews is needed13 cited
  • 2021Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties12 cited
  • 2019How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work