Thinking Hattusha: Astronomy and Landscape in the Hittite Lands

Abstract

It is of note that no special direction of the compass seems to have been preferred either for the orientation of the temples or for that of the cult chamber themselves.Jurgen SeeherAs a natural sequel to studies of temple orientation in the Mediterranean basin, and especially of the temples of ancient Egypt,1 the Hittite monuments of the Bronze Age offer an excellent laboratory to extend further the analysis of possible astronomical or topographical orientations, or both. This would be relevant not only for comparison with other neighbouring and contemporary cultures, but also to provide insights into such an important region of the Middle East as the Anatolian Peninsula.Contemporaneous with the Egyptian New Kingdom, the inhabitants of the Hittite Empire and their masters, the Kings of the Land of Hatti, produced a most sophisticated society, heir to a long Anatolian cultural tradition lasting several millennia.2 However, to our knowledge, cultural astronomy studies in this area and particular period have been practically nil.3 Preliminary analysis of some Hittite monuments and of the written sources had shown certain clues to a possible interest in the sky, but the judgement of Jurgen Seeher,4 the director of the team currently excavating at Hattusha, the Hittite capital, was so categorically negative regarding the question that apparently there was no hope of obtaining a positive result.However, it is the intention of this article to show that the analysis of a statistically significant sample of Hittite temples - and a handful of monumental gates - demonstrates that ancient Hittite monuments were not randomly orientated. On the contrary, there were well-defined patterns of orientation that could be interpreted within the context of Hittite culture and religion. The Hittite sample will be complemented with a preliminary set of data for Phrygian religious monuments. This will serve to analyse the transition of orientation customs from the Late Bronze Age to the Early Iron Age. This sample from ancient Phrygia will be compared with data in the excellent work of Susanne Bernt-Ersoz.5The paper deals with different topics. In Section 1, we analyse the geographical, historical and anthropological context. Special care is devoted to analysing ancient Hittite religion within its Anatolian context, notably the solar cults and the festival calendar. Section 2 presents our data on the Hittite monuments and tries to offer clues to their interpretation. The Phrygian data are presented and analysed in Section 3, offering a basis for future research. Finally, Section 4 presents the conclusions, both definitive and preliminary, of our work.1. STATE OF THE QUESTION: INTRODUCTIONThe Hittite Empire was a multi-lingual, multi-cultural political entity that controlled the life of Anatolia and the Levant for more than three centuries. From their homeland in the Land of Hatti (see Figure 1), the Hittite kings dominated a vast territory of varying frontiers which at its maximum extent in the late thirteenth century b.c. included, thanks to a network of vassal states, most of Anatolia and the north of Syria. The nucleus of the kingdom was formed by the Land of Hatti proper, the Upper and Lower Lands, and the neighbouring territories of Kizuwatna and Tarhuntassa. This area was populated not only by Hittites, speaking Nesili, the language of Nesha, but also by Luwians and Palaians, speaking parentage languages of Indo-European lineage, Hurrians (notably in Kizuwatna) and, to an extent difficult to discern, ancient Hattians, the original inhabitants of the region. It has been argued that the latter group language, Hattic, was a dead language used only in religious rituals during most of Hittite history and that, at the end of the kingdom (c. 1200 b.c.), even Nesili was used only for state politics and religious purposes, while Luwian was the language spoken by the vast majority of the population.6As a consequence of this population mix, Hittite religion and social customs were a complicated blend of different traditions. …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.