SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist.
16 references·3 citing·36 second hop
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. (2015)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in s…The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)The nuts and bolts of PROSPER…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review (2011)'Scoping the scope' of a coch…2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)2009 Updated Method Guideline…Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead (2008)Undue reliance on I 2 in asse…Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Systematic Review and Meta-an…Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Updated Method Guidelines for…Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies (1998)Meta-analysis Spurious precis…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …A Century of Evolution in Spine Surgery Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Field From 1900 to 2023 (2023)A Century of Evolution in Spi…The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)The use of systematic reviews…An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature (2019)An Evaluation of Publication …Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide (2013)A meta-analysis and model of the relationship between sleep and depression in adolescents: Recommendations for future research and clinical practice (2014)Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission (2020)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)YOGA FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS (2013)A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus (2014)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review and Meta-analysis2,258 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
  • 20092009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group1,663 cited
  • 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2008Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead1,286 cited
  • 2011'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,259 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies997 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature26 cited
    • 2023A Century of Evolution in Spine Surgery Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Field From 1900 to 202322 cited
    • 2019The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis15 cited