SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
6 references·9 citing·43 second hop
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide (2016)Rigorous Science: a How-To GuideThe Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms (2011)Reforming Science: Methodolog…Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Conjectures and Refutations (1963)Conjectures and RefutationsThe changing roles of scientific journals (2024)The changing roles of scienti…Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers (2023)Quantifying revolutionary dis…Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication (2022)Improving research integrity:…Updating the PhD: making the case for interdisciplinarity in twenty-first-century doctoral education (2021)Updating the PhD: making the …The science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health (2021)The science of spin: targeted…Framework for advancing rigorous research (2020)Framework for advancing rigor…On the difficulties of being rigorous in environmental geochemistry studies: some recommendations for designing an impactful paper (2019)On the difficulties of being …Making the scientific literature fail-safe (2018)Making the scientific literat…Getting rigorous with scientific rigor (2017)Getting rigorous with scienti…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science (2012)Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Preregistering qualitative research (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association (1999)Time Trends in Autism and in MMR Immunization Coverage in California (2001)Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe (2019)The Ethical Compass: Establishing ethical guidelines for research practices in sports medicine and exercise science (2024)Inquiry‐based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 (2009)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)From Methods to Monographs: Fostering a Culture of Research Quality (2023)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent (2011)The disinformation playbook: how industry manipulates the science-policy process—and how to restore scientific integrity (2021)Conflicts of Interest in the Assessment of Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution (2023)The Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES): methodological guidance for systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses (2023)Types, sources, and claims of Covid-19 misinformation (2023)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)From consolidation to disruption: A novel way to measure the impact of scientists and identify laureates (2023)Unveiling the impact and dual innovation of funded research (2023)Quantifying the degree of scientific innovation breakthrough: Considering knowledge trajectory change and impact (2024)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Democracy and Disagreement (1995)First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias (1999)Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 1963Conjectures and Refutations1,069 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2011Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms156 cited

Cited by

  • 2021The science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health68 cited
  • 2017Getting rigorous with scientific rigor56 cited
  • 2023Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers36 cited
  • 2020Framework for advancing rigorous research29 cited
  • 2022Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication29 cited
  • 2021Updating the PhD: making the case for interdisciplinarity in twenty-first-century doctoral education24 cited
  • 2019On the difficulties of being rigorous in environmental geochemistry studies: some recommendations for designing an impactful paper21 cited
  • 2024The changing roles of scientific journals18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Making the scientific literature fail-safe10 cited