SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interpreting trial sequential analysis
8 references·0 citing·33 second hopsampled
Interpreting trial sequential analysis (2016)Interpreting trial sequential analysisUpdating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias (2009)Updating meta-analyses leads …Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)Trial sequential analysis rev…Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations (2008)Meta-analysis: Its strengths …Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? (2008)Can trial sequential monitori…Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses (2008)Apparently conclusive meta-an…Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Trial sequential analysis may…Pooling Research Results: Benefits and Limitations of Meta-Analysis (1999)Pooling Research Results: Ben…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (2013)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Trial sequential methods for meta‐analysis (2013)Acceptance and commitment therapy – Do we know enough? Cumulative and sequential meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (2015)Trial sequential analysis: adding a new dimension to meta‐analysis (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)Does Working Memory Training Transfer? A Meta-Analysis Including Training Conditions as Moderators (2015)Meaning in life and physical health: systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)The Gamification of Learning: a Meta-analysis (2019)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Thresholds for the cost–effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches (2014)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Meta‐analyses of the incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia: conceptual and methodological issues (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)A meta-analytic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
  • 2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
  • 2008Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses917 cited
  • 2008Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?834 cited
  • 2008Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations519 cited
  • 1999Pooling Research Results: Benefits and Limitations of Meta-Analysis158 cited
  • 2009Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias103 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work