SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study
16 references·2 citing·50 second hop
Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study (2016)Assessing the validity of abbreviated lit…Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study (2016)Comparing the coverage, recal…Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions (2015)Using data sources beyond Pub…Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda (2015)Rapid Review Summit: an overv…EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews (2015)EPC Methods: An Exploration o…An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods (2015)An international survey and m…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…Where and how to search for information on the effectiveness of public health interventions – a case study for prevention of cardiovascular disease (2014)Where and how to search for i…Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2014)Meta-epidemiologic analysis i…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Expediting systematic reviews…Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Comparisons of Citations in W…Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment (2008)Rapid reviews versus full sys…Updating Systematic Reviews (2007)Updating Systematic ReviewsSearching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies (2005)Searching one or two database…How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)How important are comprehensi…Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research (2002)Statistical methods for asses…“It has no meaning to me.” How do researchers understand the effectiveness of literature searches? A qualitative analysis and preliminary typology of understandings (2020)“It has no meaning to me.” Ho…Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation (2019)Challenges of rapid reviews f…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews (2013)How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3) (2016)The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study (2016)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews (2012)Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition‐specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues (2021)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map (2018)Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review (2019)The Impact of COVID-19 School Closure on Child and Adolescent Health: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? (2008)Applications of text mining within systematic reviews (2011)What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis. (2016)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Suicide Behavior (2007)Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide (2018)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,145 cited
  • 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
  • 2010Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews752 cited
  • 2002Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research380 cited
  • 2008Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment226 cited
  • 2016Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study202 cited
  • 2015Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions166 cited
  • 2005Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies137 cited
  • 2015An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods130 cited
  • 2014Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews69 cited
  • 2015EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

62 cited
  • 2007Updating Systematic Reviews51 cited
  • 2015Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda31 cited
  • 2014Where and how to search for information on the effectiveness of public health interventions – a case study for prevention of cardiovascular disease20 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020“It has no meaning to me.” How do researchers understand the effectiveness of literature searches? A qualitative analysis and preliminary typology of understandings15 cited
    • 2019Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation9 cited