SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers (2016)Preventing Publication of Falsified and F…Strategies for Using Plagiarism Software in the Screening of Incoming Journal Manuscripts: Recommendations Based on a Recent Literature Survey (2016)Strategies for Using Plagiari…Organised crime against the academic peer review system (2016)Organised crime against the a…US vaccine researcher sentenced to prison for fraud (2015)US vaccine researcher sentenc…Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process (2015)Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking t…What Studies of Retractions Tell Us (2014)What Studies of Retractions T…Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2013)Research Misconduct in Low- a…Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries (2013)Policies and Initiatives Aime…China's Publication Bazaar (2013)China's Publication BazaarMisconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms (2011)Reforming Science: Methodolog…Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study (2011)Exploring Why and How Journal…Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction (2009)Fraud and misconduct in scien…Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science (2009)Discussing plagiarism in Lati…Beautification and fraud (2006)Beautification and fraudReview. Histopathology and the ‘third great lie’. When is an image not a scientifically authentic image? (2001)Review. Histopathology and th…Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (1982)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country (2014)Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews? (2015)Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers (2017)Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook (1999)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Analyzing Qualitative Data (2007)Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study (2013)Retractions in orthopaedic research (2016)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science (2016)Retractions covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 period: prevalence for the most productive countries (2018)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups (1995)Recycling Texts or Stealing Time?: Plagiarism, Authorship, and Credit in Science (2012)Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases (2015)Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru (2016)The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)Responsible Conduct of Research (2009)Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity (2015)Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct (2016)Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications (2017)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science (2012)Preregistering qualitative research (2019)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)“It is important to reinforce the importance of …”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials (2019)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? (2017)Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2013China's Publication Bazaar256 cited
  • 2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
  • 2015Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process163 cited
  • 2013Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries159 cited
  • 2011Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms156 cited
  • 2011Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study83 cited
  • 2014What Studies of Retractions Tell Us81 cited
  • 2013Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries67 cited
  • 2009Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science57 cited
  • 2015US vaccine researcher sentenced to prison for fraud44 cited
  • 2001Review. Histopathology and the ‘third great lie’. When is an image not a scientifically authentic image?37 cited
  • 2009Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction34 cited
  • 2016Organised crime against the academic peer review system26 cited
  • 2006Beautification and fraud25 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016Strategies for Using Plagiarism Software in the Screening of Incoming Journal Manuscripts: Recommendations Based on a Recent Literature Survey23 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.