SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research integrity in China: precautions when searching the Chinese literature
12 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Research integrity in China: precautions when searching the Chinese literature (2016)Research integrity in China: precautions …Scientific Misconduct in India: Causes and Perpetuation (2015)Scientific Misconduct in Indi…China's medical research integrity questioned (2015)China's medical research inte…Scientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science? (2014)Scientific Misconduct: Also a…Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India (2014)Scientific misconduct: a pers…Scientific Integrity in Brazil (2014)Scientific Integrity in BrazilPublication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists (2014)Publication Pressure and Scie…China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology (2014)China’s rise as a major contr…Research Integrity in China (2013)Research Integrity in ChinaGuidance on research integrity: no union in Europe (2013)Guidance on research integrit…China's Publication Bazaar (2013)China's Publication BazaarThe impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media (2012)The impact of misconduct on t…Research Integrity in Greater C hina: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity from a H ong K ong Perspective (2012)Research Integrity in Greater…Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies (2023)Understanding China's constru…Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Frequency and Factors Associated With Honorary Authorship in Indian Biomedical Journals: Analysis of Papers Published From 2012 to 2013 (2018)Academic Fraud (2020)How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers (2022)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Acquiescent Response Bias as an Aspect of Cultural Communication Style (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function (1957)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)The Race between Education and Technology (2010)Women in science, medicine, and global health: call for papers (2017)Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China (2020)Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research (2022)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere (2012)Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration? (2020)A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction (2021)Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Relationship among factors affecting research misconduct in medical sciences in Iran (2020)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales (2008)Feeling our way: academia, emotions and a politics of care (2016)Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated (2019)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ (2016)Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? (2017)Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China (2018)Power and publications in Chinese academia (2019)On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations (2020)Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe (2019)Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013China's Publication Bazaar256 cited
  • 2014China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology227 cited
  • 2014Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists221 cited
  • 2013Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe83 cited
  • 2013Research Integrity in China59 cited
  • 2012The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media52 cited
  • 2015China's medical research integrity questioned45 cited
  • 2015Scientific Misconduct in India: Causes and Perpetuation33 cited
  • 2014Scientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science?26 cited
  • 2012Research Integrity in Greater C hina: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity from a H ong K ong Perspective23 cited
  • 2014Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India23 cited
  • 2014Scientific Integrity in Brazil19 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work