SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessively Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions
7 references·12 citing·48 second hop
Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessively Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions (2016)Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and …What Rights Do Authors Have? (2016)What Rights Do Authors Have?Research on the Submission, Acceptance and Publication Times of Articles Submitted to International Otorhinolaryngology Journals (2015)Research on the Submission, A…Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Publishing: The peer-review s…Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals (2013)Publication Times, Impact Fac…Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments (2009)Peer review process in medica…Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical's publishing model (2006)Publication lag in biomedical…Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process (2003)Impartial Judgment by the “Ga…Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)Rejected papers in academic p…The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing (2022)The editor: A demanding but u…Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing (2022)Accelerated Peer Review and P…Peer reviewing in the contemporary academic communications (2021)Peer reviewing in the contemp…O custo da precariedade (2021)O custo da precariedadeConflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers (2021)Conflicts of Interest Arising…Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations (2020)Silently withdrawn or retract…Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology over a 6-month period (2020)Analysis of submissions, edit…Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences (2018)Ethics in Peer Review of Acad…The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review? (2017)The Clarivate TM Analytics ac…Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Is Biomedical Research Protec…Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections (2017)Establishing Sensible and Pra…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs (2011)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? (2013)Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation (2018)Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review (2021)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)“Ghost” Publications among Applicants to a General Surgery Residency Program (2008)Effects of Print Publication Lag in Dual Format Journals on Scientometric Indicators (2013)A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals (2016)Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage (1987)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Publishing research in English-language journals: Attitudes, strategies and difficulties of multilingual scholars of medicine (2014)Chinese academics writing for publication: English teachers as text mediators (2016)Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal (2023)Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls (2009)Are the impact factor and other variables related to publishing time in ecology journals? (2016)Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: a retrospective study of bibliometric data (2019)Time to Acceptance of 3 Days for Papers About COVID-19 (2020)Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors (2014)Protecting Authors from Predatory Journals and Publishers (2016)Challenges to open peer review (2018)Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness (2021)Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Harvard Undergraduate Health Policy Review (2023)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)It’s Time We Fix the Peer Review System (2018)Are negative reviews, predatory reviewers or failed peer review rewarded at Publons? (2020)COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives (2020)The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status? (2022)Institutional logics in the open science practices of university–industry research collaboration (2023)The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process (2015)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
  • 2003Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process199 cited
  • 2009Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments107 cited
  • 2013Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals83 cited
  • 2016What Rights Do Authors Have?49 cited
  • 2006Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical's publishing model47 cited
  • 2015Research on the Submission, Acceptance and Publication Times of Articles Submitted to International Otorhinolaryngology Journals40 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections33 cited
  • 2020Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations28 cited
  • 2017The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review?22 cited
  • 2017Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?21 cited
  • 2021O custo da precariedade20 cited
  • 2021Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers20 cited
  • 2022

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing
17 cited
  • 2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences16 cited
  • 2022Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing16 cited
  • 2024Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance13 cited
  • 2021Peer reviewing in the contemporary academic communications10 cited
  • 2020Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology over a 6-month period7 cited