SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The systematic review of literature in LIS
16 references·5 citing·43 second hop
The systematic review of literature in LIS (2016)The systematic review of literature in LISA Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews (2015)A Framework for Guiding and E…Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review (2013)Ten Simple Rules for Writing …Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación (2011)Revisiones sistemáticas y met…Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis (2011)Collaboration and Productivit…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Contemporary Trends and Issues in it Adoption and Diffusion Research (2009)Contemporary Trends and Issue…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Turnover of Information Technology Professionals: A Narrative Review, Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling, and Model Development1 (2007)Turnover of Information Techn…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic Reviews in the Soc…A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model (2006)A meta-analysis of the techno…Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature* (2003)Information skills training: …Information technology diffusion: a review of empirical research (1992)Information technology diffus…Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews (1988)Organizing knowledge synthese…Systematic Review as a Research Method in Library and Information Science (2019)Systematic Review as a Resear…La Educomunicación en el contexto de alfabetización de personas jóvenes y adultas en América Latina: estado de la cuestión a partir de una revisión bibliográfica sistemática (2019)La Educomunicación en el cont…Buhos: A web-based systematic literature review management software (2018)Buhos: A web-based systematic…Systematic Literature Reviews in Social Sciences and Humanities (2017)Systematic Literature Reviews…El futuro de los repositorios institucionales (2017)El futuro de los repositorios…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Drivers to green consumption: a systematic review (2020)Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology (2021)Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework (2025)The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations (1994)The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation1 (2003)The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations1, 2 (2003)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research (2015)Conducting systematic literature review in operations management (2016)Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education (2017)A power primer. (1992)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2009)Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 (2014)Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences3,582 cited
  • 2006A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model2,903 cited
  • 1988Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews1,014 cited
  • 1992Information technology diffusion: a review of empirical research563 cited
  • 2015A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews553 cited
  • 2007Turnover of Information Technology Professionals: A Narrative Review, Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling, and Model Development1468 cited
  • 2013Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review380 cited
  • 2009Contemporary Trends and Issues in it Adoption and Diffusion Research356 cited
  • 2011Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación179 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis176 cited
  • 2003Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature*119 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Systematic Literature Reviews in Social Sciences and Humanities32 cited
    • 2019Systematic Review as a Research Method in Library and Information Science22 cited
    • 2018Buhos: A web-based systematic literature review management software21 cited
    • 2019La Educomunicación en el contexto de alfabetización de personas jóvenes y adultas en América Latina: estado de la cuestión a partir de una revisión bibliográfica sistemática16 cited
    • 2017El futuro de los repositorios institucionales11 cited