SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Error and Exaggeration in the Presentation of DNA Evidence
0 references·16 citing·35 second hop
Error and Exaggeration in the Presentation of DNA Evidence (1993)Error and Exaggeration in the Presentatio…Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence? (2013)Do Jurors Give Appropriate We…If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony (2011)If the Shoe Fits They Might A…Dealing with DNA Evidence: A Legal Guide (2007)Dealing with DNA Evidence: A …Train Our Jurors (2006)Train Our JurorsWhy do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work on information, which needs representation (1996)Why do frequency formats impr…The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses (1996)The purpose of experiments: E…The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks (1996)The implicit use of base rate…The base rate controversy: Is the glass half-full or half-empty? (1996)The base rate controversy: Is…Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm? (1996)Studying the use of base rate…Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus (1996)Judgment under uncertainty: E…How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of systematic processing (1996)How to reconsider the base ra…First things first: What is a base rate? (1996)First things first: What is a…Fallacy and controversy about base rates (1996)Fallacy and controversy about…Critical and natural sensitivity to base rates (1996)Critical and natural sensitiv…Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic (1996)Cognitive algebra versus repr…Base rates, experience, and the big picture (1996)Base rates, experience, and t…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment (2013)The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions (2013)Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. (2014)Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. (1967)Mock jurors’ use of error rates in DNA database trawls. (2013)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness (1972)Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. (2016)The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence (2019)Towards another paradigm for forensic science? (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Evolution and the Theory of Games (1988)Experimental practices in economics: A challenge for psychologists? (2000)THE AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOUR: THE CASE OF TRAVEL HABIT (2000)Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. (2002)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Even Bernoulli might have been wrong: a comment on intuitions about sample size (2000)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Use of Base Rate Information as a Function of Experienced Consistency (2005)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences: Table 1 (2005)Direct action of radiation on mummified cells: modeling of computed tomography by Monte Carlo algorithms (2013)‘The Innocent v The Fickle Few’: How Jurors Understand Random-Match-Probabilities and Judges’ Directions when Reasoning about DNA and Refuting Evidence (2017)Another Look at Reasoning Experiments: Rationality, Normative Models and Conversational Factors (1997)Introduction (2019)What Is Rationality? (2019)Base-rate sensitivity through implicit learning (2017)Toward a more nuanced understanding of probability estimation biases (2023)Gauging the impact of behavior change interventions: A tutorial on the Numbers Needed to Treat (2017)Noisy Retrieval of Experienced Probabilities Underlies Rational Judgment of Uncertain Multiple Events (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
  • 2013Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?37 cited
  • 2007Dealing with DNA Evidence: A Legal Guide30 cited
  • 1996Fallacy and controversy about base rates19 cited
  • 1996The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses16 cited
  • 1996The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks13 cited
  • 2006Train Our Jurors12 cited
  • 1996Why do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work on information, which needs representation10 cited
  • 1996The base rate controversy: Is the glass half-full or half-empty?8 cited
  • 1996Base rates, experience, and the big picture6 cited
  • 1996How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of systematic processing5 cited
  • 1996Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus5 cited
  • 1996Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic4 cited
  • 1996First things first: What is a base rate?4 cited
  • 1996

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm?
4 cited
  • 1996Critical and natural sensitivity to base rates3 cited