SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews
16 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews (2016)Statistical controversies in clinical res…Meta-Analysis with R (2015)Meta-Analysis with RInvestigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)Investigation of publication …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences (2012)Publication Bias in the Organ…GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias (2011)GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating t…Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis (2009)Empirical evaluation suggests…H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1. (2007)H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, …Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Publication Bias in Meta‐Anal…Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Publication Bias in Meta‐Anal…Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Optimal search strategies for…A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews (2001)A sensitivity analysis for pu…Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (2021)Systematic Reviews and Meta‐A…Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)Assessing treatment effects a…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: Experimental Evidence from Kenya* (2016)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis (2014)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Overweight, Obesity, and Depression (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Travel and the Built Environment (2010)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta‐Essentials : A free and simple tool for meta‐analysis (2017)Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education (2021)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis2,369 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2007H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1.1,251 cited
  • 2015Meta-Analysis with R1,228 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.746 cited
  • 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis603 cited
  • 2014Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study431 cited
  • 2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey422 cited
  • 2012Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

398 cited
  • 2001A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews258 cited
  • 2009Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis133 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study41 cited
    • 2021Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis8 cited