SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Predatory Journals: The Worst Thing in Publishing, Ever
7 references·4 citing·31 second hop
Predatory Journals: The Worst Thing in Publishing, Ever (2017)Predatory Journals: The Worst Thing in Pu…Predatory Journals Threaten the Quality of Published Medical Research (2017)Predatory Journals Threaten t…Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics (2016)Hijacked journals, hijacked w…Ban predators from the scientific record (2016)Ban predators from the scient…Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Firm action needed on predato…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Investigating journals: The d…Predatory Publications in the Era of the Internet and Technology: Open Access Publications are at Risk (2022)Predatory Publications in the…The Perils of Predatory Journals and Conferences (2020)The Perils of Predatory Journ…Open Access Physical Therapy Journals: Do Predatory Journals Publish Lower-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials? (2020)Open Access Physical Therapy …How to Choose Where to Publish Your Work (2017)How to Choose Where to Publis…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of “Academic Spam” (2020)Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (2023)Selecting an Appropriate Publication Outlet: A Comprehensive Model of Journal Selection Criteria for Researchers in a Broad Range of Academic Disciplines (2008)Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review (2023)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers (2017)The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)Knowledge and Influence of Predatory Journals in Dermatology: A Pan-Austrian Survey (2018)Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics (2018)Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study (2023)Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries (2023)Revistas predatórias (2023)Quantity over quality of publications: Are we using the right metrics to judge author’s productivity and impact in biomedical research? (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2013Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing349 cited
  • 2015Firm action needed on predatory journals242 cited
  • 2016Ban predators from the scientific record126 cited
  • 2016Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics77 cited
  • 2017Predatory Journals Threaten the Quality of Published Medical Research35 cited

Cited by

  • 2017How to Choose Where to Publish Your Work19 cited
  • 2020The Perils of Predatory Journals and Conferences18 cited
  • 2020Open Access Physical Therapy Journals: Do Predatory Journals Publish Lower-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials?17 cited
  • 2022Predatory Publications in the Era of the Internet and Technology: Open Access Publications are at Risk9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work