SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer review in practice
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Peer review in practice (2017)Peer review in practiceWhat We Still Don't Know About Peer Review (2016)What We Still Don't Know Abou…Peer review: The current landscape and future trends (2016)Peer review: The current land…Monographs and open access (2016)Monographs and open accessBuilding on success and learning from experience: an independent review of the Research Excellence Framework (2016)Building on success and learn…Vigilante Science (2015)Vigilante ScienceAccountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Accountability in context: ef…The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The publishing delay in schol…Planned obsolescence: publishing, technology, and the future of the academy (2012)Planned obsolescence: publish…The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities (2010)The controversial policies of…Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)Improving the peer-review pro…Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience (2007)Peer review for the evaluatio…Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey (2006)Why do peer reviewers decline…Becoming Vanilla Pudding (2005)Becoming Vanilla PuddingThe Influence of Peer Review on the Research Assessment Exercise (2004)The Influence of Peer Review …Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry (2004)Peer Review: A Critical Inqui…From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review (2002)From Book Censorship to Acade…The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Prominent but Less Productive (2016)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The Future of the Internet--And How to Stop It (2008)“This Is Why We Fight”: Defining the Values of the Digital Humanities (2012)The Emergence of the Digital Humanities (2013)Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016 (2016)The history of the Royal Society of London .... (1968)The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (1988)The history of the Royal Society of London for the improving of natural knowledge (2001)Tourism and Post-Disciplinary Enquiry (2006)Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors (2010)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics? (2010)The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature (2010)Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics (2015)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. (2009)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals (2011)Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history (2013)Graduate Education and Social Stratification (2017)Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (1995)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: a generational perspective (2015)Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis (2019)Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Gender bias in scholarly peer review (2017)Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication? (2011)Commensuration Bias in Peer Review (2015)Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science (2015)Fewer numbers, better science (2016)What is science’s crisis really about? (2017)Theorizing Through Literature Reviews: The Miner-Prospector Continuum (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals432 cited
  • 2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.299 cited
  • 2016Building on success and learning from experience: an independent review of the Research Excellence Framework202 cited
  • 2002From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review200 cited
  • 2006Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey195 cited
  • 2012Planned obsolescence: publishing, technology, and the future of the academy186 cited
  • 2014Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University184 cited
  • 2004Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry124 cited
  • 2010The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities101 cited
  • 2004The Influence of Peer Review on the Research Assessment Exercise85 cited
  • 2016Peer review: The current landscape and future trends71 cited
  • 2005Becoming Vanilla Pudding53 cited
  • 2016Monographs and open access46 cited
  • 2007Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience46 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Vigilante Science
40 cited
  • 2016What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review38 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.