SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification
6 references·2 citing·24 second hop
What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification (2016)What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scien…Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh (2016)Evidence for non‐random sampl…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Boldt: the great pretender (2013)Boldt: the great pretenderThe analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)The analysis of 168 randomise…Retraction record rocks community (2012)Retraction record rocks commu…Susceptibility to Fraud in Systematic Reviews (2009)Susceptibility to Fraud in Sy…Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity (2017)Seeking and reporting apparen…Errors and Integrity in Seeking and Reporting Apparent Research Misconduct (2017)Errors and Integrity in Seeki…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Fraud or flawed: adverse impact of fabricated or poor quality research (2010)An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019)Flawed, futile, and fabricated—features that limit confidence in clinical research in pain and anaesthesia: a narrative review (2022)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)The Scott Reuben Saga (2011)Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights (2006)An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud (2017)Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions (2020)Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)How a data detective exposed suspicious medical trials (2019)Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements (2015)An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii (2018)Just Post It (2013)False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2012The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity254 cited
  • 2013Boldt: the great pretender113 cited
  • 2016Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh64 cited
  • 2009Susceptibility to Fraud in Systematic Reviews50 cited
  • 2012Retraction record rocks community22 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Errors and Integrity in Seeking and Reporting Apparent Research Misconduct15 cited
  • 2017Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work