SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why are we not evaluating multiple competing hypotheses in ecology and evolution?
16 references·5 citing·31 second hop
Why are we not evaluating multiple competing hypotheses in ecology and evolution? (2017)Why are we not evaluating multiple compet…Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)Quantifying the evolution of …Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Thinking, Fast and SlowFalse-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding (2004)Is Science Value Free?: Value…Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquito…Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as a Process: An Evol…‘Surely You're Joking, Mr Feynman!’ Adventures of a Curious Character (1985)‘Surely You're Joking, Mr Fey…Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists (1974)Norms and Counter-Norms in a …The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses (1965)The Method of Multiple Workin…Strong Inference (1964)Strong InferenceThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC R…Design of Experiments (1936)Design of ExperimentsThe Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses (1890)The Method of Multiple Workin…Transdisciplinary science and the importance of Indigenous knowledge (2023)Transdisciplinary science and…Towards a more realistic interpretation of the human fossil record (2022)Towards a more realistic inte…The Citizen Observatory: Enabling Next Generation Citizen Science (2021)The Citizen Observatory: Enab…The best predictions in experimental biology are critical and persuasive (2020)The best predictions in exper…Ecology, Evidence, and Objectivity: In Search of a Bias-Free Methodology (2019)Ecology, Evidence, and Object…The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management (1992)Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research (1992)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? (2000)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Fake News Detection on Social Media (2017)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS (1946)Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods (1974)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions (1994)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)Cognitive Linguistics (2004)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories (1982)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013)Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities (2014)Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning (2018)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
  • 2011Thinking, Fast and Slow14,316 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1963THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS8,424 cited
  • 1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises7,230 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 1936Design of Experiments4,949 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 1964Strong Inference2,904 cited
  • 1988Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science2,061 cited
  • 1965The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses1,071 cited
  • 2016Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact624 cited
  • 1974Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists510 cited
  • 1890The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses504 cited
  • 2004Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding419 cited
  • 1985‘Surely You're Joking, Mr Feynman!’ Adventures of a Curious Character

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

416 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Transdisciplinary science and the importance of Indigenous knowledge20 cited
  • 2022Towards a more realistic interpretation of the human fossil record19 cited
  • 2019Ecology, Evidence, and Objectivity: In Search of a Bias-Free Methodology11 cited
  • 2020The best predictions in experimental biology are critical and persuasive8 cited
  • 2021The Citizen Observatory: Enabling Next Generation Citizen Science3 cited