SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Specific agreement on dichotomous outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters
16 references·2 citing·30 second hop
Specific agreement on dichotomous outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters (2017)Specific agreement on dichotomous outcome…Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters (2014)Handbook of Inter-Rater Relia…Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's (2013)Clinicians are right not to l…Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial (2012)Computing Inter-Rater Reliabi…Statistical Tools for Measuring Agreement (2011)Statistical Tools for Measuri…Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reli…The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter (2005)The dependence of Cohen's kap…Measures of interobserver agreement (2004)Measures of interobserver agr…Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxes (1996)Behavior and interpretation o…Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Bias, prevalence and kappaDesign and Analysis of Reliability Studies: The Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors. (1991)Design and Analysis of Reliab…High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low kappa:…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…Design and analysis of reliability studies: the statistical evaluation of measurement errors (1990)Design and analysis of reliab…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. (1971)Measures of response agreemen…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Evaluating Implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines: Reliability of Instruments to Assess Journal Policies, Procedures, and Practices (2023)Evaluating Implementation of …Specific agreement on ordinal and multiple nominal outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters (2017)Specific agreement on ordinal…Rank Correlation Methods. (1957)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis (1974)The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments (1975)Rape Myth Acceptance: Exploration of Its Structure and Its Measurement Using theIllinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (1999)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Measuring agreement in method comparison studies (1999)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications (2012)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)TWO CRITERIA FOR GOOD MEASUREMENTS IN RESEARCH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY (2017)Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research (2019)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity (2000)Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Fleiss’ kappa statistic without paradoxes (2014)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies (2015)Issues and Best Practices in Content Analysis (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2012Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial3,882 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 2010Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed2,206 cited
  • 1993Bias, prevalence and kappa2,175 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes1,836 cited
  • 2014Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters1,097 cited
  • 1971Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives.750 cited
  • 1996Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxes311 cited
  • 2013Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's251 cited
  • 2005The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter182 cited
  • 1991Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies: The Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors.182 cited
  • 1990Design and analysis of reliability studies: the statistical evaluation of measurement errors169 cited
  • 2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Statistical Tools for Measuring Agreement
139 cited
  • 2004Measures of interobserver agreement133 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Specific agreement on ordinal and multiple nominal outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters27 cited
    • 2023Evaluating Implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines: Reliability of Instruments to Assess Journal Policies, Procedures, and Practices8 cited