Making sense of replications

Brian A. Nosek · Timothy M. Errington

241 citations0/0 files storedeLife

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Publishing and Open Access Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Animal testing and alternatives

Abstract

The first results from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology suggest that there is scope for improving reproducibility in pre-clinical cancer research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 241 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience 2011False-Positive Psychology 2015Promoting an open research culture 2009Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences 2012Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex 2014An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research

Cited by

2017Making replication mainstream 2017The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research 2020Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice 2018Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy 2019Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science 2021Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.