A Primary Study of Relevance between Baumtest with Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

绘画投射法能挖掘个人潜在的心理特征，从而弥补当前量表测量法的不足。本研究利用73个案例的抑郁自评量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS)和焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS)的标准分和树木-人格投射测验的40项具体绘画特征进行Spearman相关分析，得出结果为：线条清淡轻力度与焦虑正相关(r = 0.255)，不用彩笔与抑郁正相关(r = 0.241)；在20岁以下的青少年组中，抑郁与突出果实(r = −0.524)和树左右偏斜(r = −0.530)均呈负相关，焦虑与线条清淡轻力度呈正相关(r = 0.574)；在20~39岁的青壮年组中，焦虑与线条粗重重力度呈负相关(r = −0.371)；在40岁以上的中老年组中，焦虑与树左右偏斜(r = 0.515)和两种或以上彩色(r = 0.576)均呈正相关，以上所有相关在0.05上的水平上显著。 Projective drawing, which reveals one’s potential personality, can remedy the defect of self-report inventories. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the relevance between the standard scores of SDS, SAS in 73 cases and 40 painting characteristics of Baumtest. As a result, light strength was positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.255); not using color pen was positively correlated with depression (r = 0.241). In the adolescence group under 20 years, emphasized fruit (r = −0.524) and deflected tree (r = −0.530) were negatively correlated with depression, while light strength was positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.574); in the post-adolescence group between 20 and 39 years, heavy strength was negatively correlated with anxiety (r = −0.371); in the middlescence over 40 years, deflected tree (r = 0.515) and using 2 or more colors (r = 0.576) were positively correlated with anxiety. The above relevance is obvious on the level of 0.05.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.