SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Does dual tasking ability change with age across childhood and adolescence? A systematic scoping review
5 references·0 citing·18 second hop
Does dual tasking ability change with age across childhood and adolescence? A systematic scoping review (2017)Does dual tasking ability change with age…Walking in School-Aged Children in a Dual-Task Paradigm Is Related to Age But Not to Cognition, Motor Behavior, Injuries, or Psychosocial Functioning (2016)Walking in School-Aged Childr…Building a Framework for a Dual Task Taxonomy (2015)Building a Framework for a Du…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…An Ecological Approach to Studying Aging and Dual-Task Performance (2005)An Ecological Approach to Stu…Multiple resources and performance prediction (2002)Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture (2004)Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions (2005)Cognitive-motor dual-task ability of athletes with and without intellectual impairment (2017)A Current View on Dual-Task Paradigms and Their Limitations to Capture Cognitive Load (2021)Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood (2002)The Structure of Working Memory From 4 to 15 Years of Age. (2004)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Individual differences in working memory and reading (1980)Working Memory (1992)The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. (1996)Factors affecting cognitive development and plasticity in old age (2011)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2015Building a Framework for a Dual Task Taxonomy257 cited
  • 2005An Ecological Approach to Studying Aging and Dual-Task Performance76 cited
  • 2016Walking in School-Aged Children in a Dual-Task Paradigm Is Related to Age But Not to Cognition, Motor Behavior, Injuries, or Psychosocial Functioning55 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work