Different Identity Formations in Bengal Partition Narratives by Dalit Refugees

Abstract

This essay examines the representation of Dalit refugees’ experiences in post-Partition West Bengal through Adhir Biswas’ memoirs Deshbhager smriti ([Biswas, Adhir. 2010. Deshbhager Smriti. 4 vols. Kolkata: Gangchil], Bengali) and Allar jomite paa ([Biswas, Adhir. 2012 Biswas, Adhir. 2012. Allar jomite paa. Kolkata: Gangchil. [Google Scholar]. Allar jomite paa. Kolkata: Gangchil], Bengali) and Manoranjan Byapari’s autobiographical work Itibritte chandal jibon ([Byapari, Manoranjan. 2012. Itibritte Chandal Jibon. 1 vol. Kolkata: Kolkata Prakashan], Bengali). In terms of the literary representation of Bengali refugees, until recently it was only the voice of the bhadralok class that was heard, which spoke for all sections of refugees. I suggest Bengali refugeeness cannot be constructed as a “homogenized” phenomenon belonging only to the bhadralok class. Such a representation screens the non-bhadralok Dalit and Muslim refugee’s voice, whom the East Bengali bhadralok had socioeconomically subjugated up until Partition. Lacking the pre-given criteria for being considered “refined” – high caste, economic empowerment and cultural and social capital – but progressively acquiring them under the auspices of post-Partition social dynamics, how do Biswas and Byapari encounter the signification of bhadralok? What new notions of “bhadra” and “Dalit” are formed in their respective situations as a result of marriage between the “refined” and “unrefined” ways of living? In answering these questions, this essay approaches the bhadralok--chhotolok undercurrents in the above texts and examines the difficulty of pinning down their identities within any single category.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.