SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The fate of manuscripts rejected from Anaesthesia
10 references·2 citing·42 second hop
The fate of manuscripts rejected from Anaesthesia (2017)The fate of manuscripts rejected from Ana…Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh (2016)Evidence for non‐random sampl…Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Medical Publishing Triage - C…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery (2010)Fate of manuscripts declined …Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar (2007)Comparing test searches in Pu…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…What happens to the manuscripts that have not been accepted for publication inOccupational and Environmental Medicine? (2001)What happens to the manuscrip…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts? (2023)Is peer review duration short…From traditional Bibliometrics to Altmetrics: Socialising the research metrics (2021)From traditional Bibliometric…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)The influence of knowledge-based resources and business scholars’ internationalization strategies on research performance (2013)Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2017)The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal (2017)Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts (2000)The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal (2000)Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Scientific production and international collaboration in occupational health, 1992-2001 (2004)Bibliometric Research in Occupational Health (2008)Outcomes of Rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Manuscripts (2008)Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights (2006)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Boldt: the great pretender (2013)An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud (2017)Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions (2020)Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation (2017)How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Is body dissatisfaction changing across time? A cross-temporal meta-analysis. (2016)Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 2007Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar231 cited
  • 2013Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers125 cited
  • 2016Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh64 cited
  • 2010Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery31 cited
  • 2001What happens to the manuscripts that have not been accepted for publication inOccupational and Environmental Medicine?23 cited

Cited by

  • 2021From traditional Bibliometrics to Altmetrics: Socialising the research metrics15 cited
  • 2023Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work