SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Heterogeneity in meta‐analyses. Comparing apples and oranges?
6 references·1 citing·31 second hop
Heterogeneity in meta‐analyses. Comparing apples and oranges? (2017)Heterogeneity in meta‐analyses. Comparing…Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted? (2016)Can systematic reviews with s…Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthesia (2015)Reviews, systematic reviews a…The Interpretation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis in Decision Models (2005)The Interpretation of Random-…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data (2000)An evaluation of homogeneity …Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Review papers : The statistic…Number of studies, heterogeneity, generalisability, and the choice of method for meta-analysis (2017)Number of studies, heterogene…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Affective Disorders and Suicide Risk: A Reexamination (2000)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID‐19 patients: a meta‐analysis (2020)Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1998)An initial meta-analysis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for treating substance use disorders (2015)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)A meta-analysis of signaling principle in multimedia learning environments (2020)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012)Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Funnels for publication bias – have we lost the plot? (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta‐epidemiological study (2016)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)How to perform and write a trial sequential analysis (2022)Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1993Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis1,284 cited
  • 2005The Interpretation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis in Decision Models859 cited
  • 2000An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data278 cited
  • 2015Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthesia56 cited
  • 2016Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?56 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Number of studies, heterogeneity, generalisability, and the choice of method for meta-analysis43 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work