Articlebronze2017

Investigator bias and the PACE trial

10 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Health Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Abstract

The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: An overview of reviews 2015A systematic appraisal of allegiance effect in randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy 2012Is the allegiance effect an epiphenomenon of true efficacy differences between treatments? A meta-analysis.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.