Ethics and Statistics: Honesty and Transparency Are Not Enough

Andrew Gelman

31 citations0/0 files storedCHANCE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistics Education and Methodologies

Abstract

There has been a replication crisis in applied statistics (most notably in psychology, but also in social science and medical research), in which studies published in top scientific journals “fail ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience 2014Beyond Power Calculations 2016Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking 2009Of Beauty, Sex and Power 2014A new etiquette for replication.2008Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small eects

Cited by

2020The Hidden Talents Approach: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges 2022Research transparency in dental research: A programmatic analysis 2024Ethical Issues in Educational Research 2020The multiplicity of analysis strategies jeopardizes replicability: lessons learned across disciplines

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.