Articlehybrid2017

Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

Jonathan Rabinowitz · Nina R. Schooler · Ariana Anderson · Lindsay E. Ayearst · David Gordon Daniel · Michael Davidson +7 more

15 citations0/0 files storedSchizophrenia Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Schizophrenia research and treatment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Abstract

International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened an expert working-group that assembled consistency/inconsistency flags for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Twenty-four flags were identified and divided based on extent to which they represent error (Possibly, Probably, Very probably or definitely). The flags were applied to assessments derived from the NEWMEDS data repository and the CATIE clinical trial data. Almost 40% of ratings had at least one inconsistency flag raised and 10% had two. Application of flags to clinical rating can improve reliability and validity of trials.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

2006DSM and the Death of Phenomenology in America: An Example of Unintended Consequences

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.