SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times
8 references·16 citing·42 second hop
Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times (2017)Quantifying the effect of editor–author r…Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Publishing: The peer-review s…Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks (2014)Predicting scientific success…Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity (2005)Individual and collective det…Social Stratification in Science (1974)Social Stratification in Scie…Social Stratification in Science (1974)Social Stratification in Scie…Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)Social Theory and Social Stru…Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Social Theory and Social Stru…Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review (2022)Can transparency undermine pe…Bias against scientific novelty: A prepublication perspective (2022)Bias against scientific novel…Academic favoritism at work: insider bias in Turkish national journals (2022)Academic favoritism at work: …The internationality of published higher education scholarship: How do the ‘top’ journals compare? (2021)The internationality of publi…The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case study (2020)The hurdles of academic publi…How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management (2020)How do journals of different …Citations driven by social connections? A multi-layer representation of coauthorship networks (2020)Citations driven by social co…The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal (2019)The “invisible hand” of peer …Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE (2019)Megajournal mismanagement: Ma…Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest (2019)Editors Should Declare Confli…The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures (2018)The peer review game: an agen…Exploration of editorial board composition, Citescore and percentiles of Hindawi journals indexed in Scopus (2018)Exploration of editorial boar…Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network (2017)Quantifying and suppressing r…Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network (2017)Quantifying and suppressing r…Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Is Biomedical Research Protec…Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections (2017)Establishing Sensible and Pra…Toward a new economics of science (1994)The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review (2001)Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D (2002)A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact (2010)Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? (2012)Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study (2015)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers (2015)GENDER DISPARITIES IN SCIENCE? DROPOUT, PRODUCTIVITY, COLLABORATIONS AND SUCCESS OF MALE AND FEMALE COMPUTER SCIENTISTS (2017)Predicting the citations of scholarly paper (2019)The Logic of Collective Action (1965)The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. (1966)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)A scoping review of simulation models of peer review (2019)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2021)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator (2020)Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals (2022)A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation (1994)The Network Structure Of Social Capital (2000)The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory (2000)Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process (2015)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (2017)A Theory of Group Stability (1991)The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test (2002)The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks (2004)?Cloning? in academe: Mentorship and academic careers (1981)Social mobility and the educational choices of Asian Americans (2003)Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings (2007)Culture and Organizations (1980)The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1958Social Theory and Social Structure10,316 cited
  • 1969Social Theory and Social Structure.6,660 cited
  • 1974Social Stratification in Science1,197 cited
  • 1974Social Stratification in Science595 cited
  • 2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
  • 2005Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity229 cited
  • 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
  • 2014Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks174 cited

Cited by

  • 2018The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures53 cited
  • 2019The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal48 cited
  • 2017Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network47 cited
  • 2019Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest41 cited
  • 2020How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management40 cited
  • 2022Bias against scientific novelty: A prepublication perspective35 cited
  • 2021The internationality of published higher education scholarship: How do the ‘top’ journals compare?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

34 cited
  • 2017Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections33 cited
  • 2019Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE31 cited
  • 2017Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network28 cited
  • 2020Citations driven by social connections? A multi-layer representation of coauthorship networks26 cited
  • 2022Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review22 cited
  • 2022Academic favoritism at work: insider bias in Turkish national journals22 cited
  • 2017Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?21 cited
  • 2018Exploration of editorial board composition, Citescore and percentiles of Hindawi journals indexed in Scopus15 cited
  • 2020The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case study14 cited