SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: beware!
0 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: beware! (2017)Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake …Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations (2023)Analysis of Retracted Publica…Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature (2022)Handling Ethics Dumping and N…How do Clarivate Analytics and Publons propose to fortify peer review in the COVID-19 era? (2021)How do Clarivate Analytics an…Fraud in higher education: a system for detection and prevention (2021)Fraud in higher education: a …Assessing the Ethics of Stings, Including from the Prism of Guidelines by Ethics-Promoting Organizations (COPE, ICMJE, CSE) (2021)Assessing the Ethics of Sting…Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills (2021)Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses b…Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure (2019)Open Access Mega-Journals: Qu…Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach (2019)Issues with criteria to creat…How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications (2019)How hyped media and misleadin…How do altmetric sources evaluate scientific collaboration? An empirical investigation for Chinese collaboration publications (2019)How do altmetric sources eval…The Google Scholar h-index: useful but burdensome metric (2018)The Google Scholar h-index: u…The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review? (2017)The Clarivate TM Analytics ac…Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation? (2017)Preprints: ethical hazard or …Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Is Biomedical Research Protec…Ethical exceptionalism: can publishing rules be manipulated to give the impression of ethical publishing? (2017)Ethical exceptionalism: can p…Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies? (2017)Does China need to rethink it…Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Establishing Rules for Ethicists and Ethics Organizations in Academic Publishing to Avoid Conflicts of Interest, Favoritism, Cronyism and Nepotism (2019)The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review (1985)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports (2024)Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review (2025)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)It’s Time We Fix the Peer Review System (2018)Are negative reviews, predatory reviewers or failed peer review rewarded at Publons? (2020)Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Why blacklists are not reliable: A theoretical framework (2020)(Mis-)Classification of 17,721 Journals by an Artificial Intelligence Predatory Journal Detector (2023)What is research collaboration? (1997)The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 (2004)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do proceedings papers in science fields have higher impacts than those in the field of social science and humanities? (2020)Evaluating the relationship between the academic and social impact of open access books based on citation behaviors and social media attention (2020)Does social media contribute to research impact? An Altmetric study of highly-cited marketing research (2024)Crime and Economic Incentives (2004)Irony, Deception and Humour (2018)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Testing the Robustness of COPE’s Characterization of Predatory Publishing on a COPE Member Publisher (Academic and Business Research Institute) (2023)The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis (2024)Don't do big-data science backwards (2013)Corruption, the Lack of Academic Integrity and Other Ethical Issues in Higher Education: What Can Be Done Within the Bologna Process? (2018)Cultural Values as Anti-Fraud Strategy: Lessons from Islamic Schools (2023)Publish or impoverish (2017)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Is Mandatory ORCID a Violation of an Author’s Freedoms and Rights? (2021)From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection (2022)Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises (2024)An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness (2014)Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical (2019)Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence (2020)Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review (2023)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Information and Misinformation on COVID-19: a Cross-Sectional Survey Study (2020)Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publications From 1975 to 2024: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends, Reasons, and Countries Using the Retraction Watch Database (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach28 cited
  • 2021Assessing the Ethics of Stings, Including from the Prism of Guidelines by Ethics-Promoting Organizations (COPE, ICMJE, CSE)27 cited
  • 2021Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills27 cited
  • 2019How do altmetric sources evaluate scientific collaboration? An empirical investigation for Chinese collaboration publications25 cited
  • 2017Ethical exceptionalism: can publishing rules be manipulated to give the impression of ethical publishing?25 cited
  • 2022Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature23 cited
  • 2017The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review?22 cited
  • 2023Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations22 cited
  • 2017Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?21 cited
  • 2021Fraud in higher education: a system for detection and prevention19 cited
  • 2017Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies?18 cited
  • 2017Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation?14 cited
  • 2018The Google Scholar h-index: useful but burdensome metric13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure12 cited
  • 2021How do Clarivate Analytics and Publons propose to fortify peer review in the COVID-19 era?11 cited
  • 2019How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications9 cited