The transformation of the academic publishing market: multiple perspectives on innovation

Diego Ponte · Bozena I. Mierzejewska · Stefan P. Klein

37 citations0/0 files storedElectronic Markets

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Library Science and Information Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

This special issue of Electronic Markets focuses on the transformation of the academic publishing market.This theme falls within the larger topic of the innovations triggered by the digital transformation, which is witnessing an increasing level of academic attention.In recent years Electronic Markets has published a series of editorials devoted to digital transformation in academic publishing: on reviewing (Alt et al. 2015), on self-archiving (Alt et al. 2016a), as well as on quantitative measures in academic publishing (Alt et al. 2016b).A number of other journals have published special issues devoted to investigate a variety of aspects related to academic publishing. 1 This growing interest can be interpreted as the increase of awareness of issues related to both, the academic publishing process and the publishing market, and also as raising need for data supported evidence of current trends and the need for an open discussion about the consequences for all involved in the process of scholarly communication.Academic publishing has been profoundly affected by a plethora of innovations that have shaped the way scientific knowledge is produced, evaluated and disseminated.Services such as SSRN, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu,Mendeley and the Open Access journals are only the visible tips of the iceberg of new players and indeed new services and modes of publishing.Innovations in this industry can be identified at different levels:

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?2015The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing 2016Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies 2012The Inevitability of Open Access 2017Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access 2017Research output availability on academic social networks: implications for stakeholders in academic publishing

Cited by

2018Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration 2017Academic Publishing, Internet Technology, and Disruptive Innovation 2018Research and innovation in higher education: empirical evidence from research and patenting in Brazil 2022The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing 2021Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context 2018The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.