Stains. Trace—Cloth—Symptom

Abstract

A stain is the evidence of something that was. It is a trace. A stain may be something quite ordinary: the ink stain on my index finger; the mark of your fingers on this book. A stain may also be embarrassing: lipstick on a cheek; sweat rings under the arms; a bloody discharge. A stain may be forensically incriminating. A stain may be kept for sentimental reasons. Moreover, every stain has its own particular texture. Texture denotes the consistency of a surface and the sensory, often tactile imprint that is left on it. The stain may be absorbed in the thing that supports it; then again, it may stay on the surface, something separate. Every stain is unique.In this article the author deals with seven factors that make the stain into a powerful model for rethinking the visual: the stain as prototype and prefiguration; the stain as relic; the stain of Veronica; the stain as a psycho-energetic symptom; the stain as pars pro toto for the womb; the stain and le désir mimétique; and finally, the stain as an image paradigm of the residue.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.