Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Melanie Claxton · Juliana Onwumere · Miriam Fornells‐Ambrojo

166 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Family Caregiving in Mental Illness Schizophrenia research and treatment Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Abstract

Family interventions for psychosis (FIp) are effective in reducing service user relapse and carer distress in people with schizophrenia-spectrum conditions. Several treatment and best practice guidelines recommend FIp for all people with schizophrenia. However, outcome findings in relation to early psychosis groups have been inconsistent. The current paper reports a systematic review and meta-analyses of articles that evaluated FIp in early psychosis with a clearly defined comparison group. A combination of electronic database searches (using PsychINFO, Medline, and CENTRAL), citation searches and hand searches of key journals and reviews was conducted. Peer-reviewed articles published in English from database inception to June 2016 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP). Seventeen papers from 14 studies met inclusion criteria for review, the overall quality of which was moderate. Meta-analytic synthesis showed that FIp improved service user functioning and reduced the likelihood of relapse by the end of treatment. Psychotic symptoms were significantly reduced in the FIp group at follow up, but this was not evident at end of treatment. In terms of FIp target mechanisms, carers receiving FIp were more likely to shift from high to low expressed emotion and less likely to report patient focused criticism or engage in conflict communication than carers randomized to standard care. Carer burden and well-being were improved by the end of treatment but gains were not sustained at follow up. FIp had no impact on carer emotional over-involvement. The findings indicate that FIp is an effective intervention for early psychosis service users and their relatives. However, further research is required to establish which key therapeutic components of FIp are most effective for whom, in addition to understanding the mechanisms by which FIp might affect positive change.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 166 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 1962The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials 1976The Global Assessment Scale 1983A Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)2004A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions

Cited by

2018Couple therapy, family therapy and systemic interventions for adult‐focused problems: the current evidence base 2019Psychological Distress, Family Support and Employment Status in First-Year University Students in Spain

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.