SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers
16 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers (2017)Five shared decision-making tools in 5 mo…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisReporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review (2016)Reporting of Adverse Events i…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating u…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Expediting systematic reviews…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisRAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? (2008)RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC …Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment (2008)Rapid reviews versus full sys…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic Reviews in the Soc…Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)Systematic reviews need syste…Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system (2003)Literature searching for clin…The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)New evidence pyramid (2016)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences3,582 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,145 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2010Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews752 cited
  • 2016Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review276 cited
  • 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
  • 2008Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment226 cited
  • 2003Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

194 cited
  • 2008RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?163 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.