SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A scientists' view of scientometrics: Not everything that counts can be counted
15 references·0 citing·39 second hop
A scientists' view of scientometrics: Not everything that counts can be counted (2017)A scientists' view of scientometrics: Not…Calibration with confidence: a principled method for panel assessment (2017)Calibration with confidence: …The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions (2016)Current Incentives for Scient…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…Scientometrics (2015)ScientometricsPredicting results of the research excellence framework using departmental h-index: revisited (2015)Predicting results of the res…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Predicting results of the Research Excellence Framework using departmental h-index (2014)Predicting results of the Res…Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence (2013)Comparison of a citation-base…Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence (2013)Absolute and specific measure…Finding a Way Through the Scientific Literature: Indexes and Measures (2011)Finding a Way Through the Sci…Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size (2011)Critical mass and the depende…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates (1992)Neocortex size as a constrain…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Networks of Scientific PapersCitation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers (2016)Gender Differences in the Publication Rate Among Breast Imaging Radiologists in the United States and Canada (2017)Bibliometrics in a Digital Age: Help or Hindrance (2018)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains (2017)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Misinformation in and about science (2021)The scientific impact of nations (2004)The Question of R&D Specialisation: Perspectives and Policy Implications (2009)Group Size Effect on Cooperation in One-Shot Social Dilemmas II: Curvilinear Effect (2015)Group size effects and critical mass in public goods games (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories (1982)Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ (2016)Fast growing research on negative emissions (2017)A Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review for Construction Project Complexity (2022)Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans (1993)Evolution in the Social Brain (2007)Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media (2011)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,124 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 1992Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates2,538 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
  • 2016Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions191 cited
  • 2015Scientometrics173 cited
  • 2011Finding a Way Through the Scientific Literature: Indexes and Measures108 cited
  • 2011Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size48 cited
  • 2013Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence45 cited
  • 2014Predicting results of the Research Excellence Framework using departmental h-index36 cited
  • 2013Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence24 cited
  • 2015Predicting results of the research excellence framework using departmental h-index: revisited17 cited
  • 2017Calibration with confidence: a principled method for panel assessment

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.