References

• 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
• 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
• 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
• 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
• 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
• 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials