Attitudes toward orthorexia nervosa relative to DSM‐5 eating disorders

Courtney C. Simpson · Suzanne E. Mazzeo

65 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Eating Disorders

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Eating Disorders and Behaviors Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior Obesity and Health Practices

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A pattern of disordered eating involving a pathological fixation with healthy food consumption, labeled orthorexia nervosa (ON), has recently generated attention; however, research has not yet investigated perceptions of ON-related behaviors. This study examined potential stigmatization of ON, compared with DSM-5 ED diagnoses. METHOD: Participants (N = 505) were randomly assigned to read a vignette depicting a woman with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-eating disorder (BED), or ON. They then answered questions about the individual depicted in the vignette. A series of MANOVAs investigated whether opinions and beliefs about the person depicted varied as a function of the disorder described in the vignette. RESULTS: Individuals with ON were perceived as less likely to "improve with treatment" than individuals with BN, and less likely to "pull themselves together," than individuals with BED. Individuals with ON and AN were viewed as "hard[er] to talk to" and more of a "danger to others" compared with individuals with BED. ON was viewed as less distressing, less likely to evoke sympathy, and more acceptable than the other disorders. Finally, "poor living choices" were perceived as contributing more substantially to ON. Participants' attributions of various personality characteristics did not differ based on ED diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that ON is viewed as less severe, more desirable, and more often the result of personal life choices. However, findings also imply that ON is associated with stigma, similar to DSM-5 EDs. These negative attitudes might reinforce ON behaviors, and limit awareness of their potential complications.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2006The Prevalence and Correlates of Eating Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication 2012Epidemiology of Eating Disorders: Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality Rates 2014The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care 2003Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders 2000Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses 1987The eating disorder examination: A semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopathology of eating disorders 2003Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in screening for eating disorders in community samples

Cited by

2020Eating disorders “mental health literacy”: a scoping review 2020Perspective: Classifying Orthorexia Nervosa as a New Mental Illness—Much Discussion, Little Evidence 2019Is #cleaneating a healthy or harmful dietary strategy? Perceptions of clean eating and associations with disordered eating among young adults 2017The stigma of clean dieting and orthorexia nervosa

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.