SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
In survey, most give thumbs-up to pirated papers
0 references·9 citing·32 second hop
In survey, most give thumbs-up to pirated papers (2016)In survey, most give thumbs-up to pirated…The structural transformation of the scientific public sphere: Constitution and consequences of the path towards open access (2023)The structural transformation…Jumping over the paywall: Strategies and motivations for scholarly piracy and other alternatives (2022)Jumping over the paywall: Str…Free access to scientific literature and its influence on the publishing activity in developing countries: The effect of Sci‐Hub in the field of mathematics (2022)Free access to scientific lit…Acceso a la literatura científica desde Sci-Hub (2021)Acceso a la literatura cientí…The case of significant variations in gold–green and black open access: evidence from Indian research output (2020)The case of significant varia…Citation databases and researcher identifiers (2020)Citation databases and resear…Can scholarly pirate libraries bridge the knowledge access gap? An empirical study on the structural conditions of book piracy in global and European academia (2020)Can scholarly pirate librarie…Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users (2018)Black Open Access in Ukraine:…The open science movement (2017)The open science movementWho's downloading pirated papers? Everyone (2016)Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone (2016)Gold, green, and black open access (2017)The social readjustment rating scale (1967)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact (2006)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Kotimaiset tieteelliset julkaisut ja avoimuus (2020)Google Scholar as a pointer to open full-text sources of research articles: A useful tool for researchers in regions with poor access to scientific literature (2022)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Structural Model of Future Employees Personal and Professional Self-Development (2017)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Media Piracy in Emerging Economies (2011)Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics and Models (2015)Open Access Models, Pirate Libraries and Advocacy Repertoires: Policy Options for Academics to Construct and Govern Knowledge Commons (2021)Sci-Hub use among Spanish researchers: Enemy or a learning opportunity for libraries? (2023)The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious (2013)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Science of science (2018)Outside the library: Early career researchers and use of alternative information sources in pandemic times (2023)Assessing the influence of GDP, globalization, civil liberties, and foreign direct investment on researchers in R&D per country: Dynamic Panel Cointegration Analysis for Latin American countries (2024)A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing (2002)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)The Crossroads of the Knowledge Economy and Renewable Energy: Recommendations for Poland (2024)Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Can scholarly pirate libraries bridge the knowledge access gap? An empirical study on the structural conditions of book piracy in global and European academia22 cited
  • 2020The case of significant variations in gold–green and black open access: evidence from Indian research output19 cited
  • 2022Free access to scientific literature and its influence on the publishing activity in developing countries: The effect of Sci‐Hub in the field of mathematics11 cited
  • 2018Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users9 cited
  • 2023The structural transformation of the scientific public sphere: Constitution and consequences of the path towards open access8 cited
  • 2022Jumping over the paywall: Strategies and motivations for scholarly piracy and other alternatives8 cited
  • 2021Acceso a la literatura científica desde Sci-Hub6 cited
  • 2020Citation databases and researcher identifiers6 cited
  • 2017The open science movement4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work