SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies of the performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis using QUADAS
12 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies of the performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis using QUADAS (2017)Evaluation of the methodological quality …STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list o…Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool …Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Understanding interobserver a…No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies (2005)No role for quality scores in…How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis? (2005)How does study quality affect…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasHigh agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low kappa:…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Consensus measurement in Delphi studies (2012)Content Analysis (2015)National Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults (2016)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis (2015)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)Diagnostic accuracy of the mood module of the Patient Health Questionnaire: a systematic review (2007)Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy (2020)Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2015STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies3,623 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes1,836 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies769 cited
  • 2005No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies337 cited
  • 2005How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?87 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work