Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1891The Principles of Psychology25,772 cited
2011Thinking, Fast and Slow14,316 cited
2005Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making5,253 cited
2000Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?4,263 cited
2013Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition4,256 cited
1983Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.3,990 cited
2003In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning2,259 cited
1997Rationality and reasoning1,075 cited
1996On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky.1,070 cited
2012Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test755 cited
2008Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious723 cited
1999The ‘conjunction fallacy’ revisited: how intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors538 cited
2015What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement477 cited
2007Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking447 cited
1988Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable.418 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007

On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning

396 cited

Cited by

2019Training higher education teachers’ critical thinking and attitudes towards teaching it96 cited
2019Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases94 cited
2020Predicting individual differences in conflict detection and bias susceptibility during reasoning66 cited
2020Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules45 cited
2020A reflection on cognitive reflection – testing convergent/divergent validity of two measures of cognitive reflection42 cited
2021Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance32 cited
2022Debiasing System 1: Training favours logical over stereotypical intuiting26 cited
2020“You're wrong!”: The impact of accuracy feedback on the bat-and-ball problem25 cited
2020Individual differences in logical intuitions on reasoning problems presented under two-response paradigm24 cited
2021Recognizing biased reasoning: Conflict detection during decision-making and decision-evaluation20 cited
2019Second-guess: Testing the specificity of error detection in the bat-and-ball problem20 cited
2019The bat-and-ball problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process.20 cited
2018To detect or not to detect: A replication and extension of the three-stage model19 cited
2023Illusory intuitive inferences: Matching heuristics explain logical intuitions17 cited
2017Exploring the determinants of confidence in the bat-and-ball problem16 cited
2021The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity15 cited